Tags: Easy Problem Solving Questions1st Amendment Research PapersTransition Sentences Analytical EssaysArgumentative Essay Writing TechniquesArgumentative Essay On Pop CultureBusiness Management Dissertation TopicsLiterature Review On Tuberculosis
Consider if evolutionary animal rights groups are right in saying there is no distinction between man and animals.3 Then what is to say there is a distinction between animals and plants?Perhaps the argument should be to also refrain from any plant use.Rights are an abstract concept that comes from a biblical worldview, which is denied by the evolutionary position.
It’s only when we start with God’s Word that we get a firm foundation for morality.
We are not animals; we were specially and uniquely created in the image of God, separate and distinct from the animals (in a similar fashion, animals are not created like the plants either).
We are morally accountable to our Creator, and His Word has provided us with clear guidelines of how we are—and are not—to behave.
Murder and theft are wrong because our Creator has decreed that we are not to kill ().
After all, no one blames a lion for ripping apart a gazelle, or a hyena for trying to steal the carcass, or microbes for finishing off the gazelle’s remains.
But somehow humans are arbitrarily viewed as different despite the insistence that we aren’t different.So if they want equal rights for animals, what rights should humans have if they believe man is just an evolved animal?For example if animals kill other animals, do animal rights groups think humans (if we’re just animals) should have equal rights to kill too?It wouldn’t take long for the animal/plant rights activists to die of starvation.An evolutionary view of mankind and morality leads to inconsistency and confusion.It’s not uncommon to see animals exalted and valued far above humans.Animal rights groups, such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), vehemently fight against the use of animals for anything, saying things such as, “Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way”1 and “When it comes to pain, love, joy, loneliness, and fear, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.We are not left drifting in an inconsistent moral sea of man’s opinions.Starting with God’s Word, we have a firm foundation for morality.Because they have no foundation, they are forced to construct a moral code that is “right in their own eyes” (). Evolutionists arbitrarily create or hold to a moral code for humans—which, in their view, includes not using anything that comes from or was even tested on animals—yet they believe we are just animals.So why should we be held to this arbitrary standard that no “other” animal is held to?