Of course, if we are supposing a clash between two "typical warriors", we must also ask exactly what will be considered typical?
The knights of circa 1100 and the samurai of circa 1200 were roughly evenly matched in equipment.
But the same comparative warriors during the 1400's for instance, were quite dissimilar.
Each of the two historical warriors in question did fight with equivalent technologies, under fairly similar climates and terrain, and for similar reasons.
Janice Nimura talked about her book Daughters of the Samurai: A Journey from East to West and Back, in which she recounts five women sent to the United States by the Japanese government in 1871 to learn and export Western culture.
In her book, the author reports that three of the five women remained in the United States for 10 years, and returned to Japan emboldened to reform women’s education.The thought of "who would win" in an actual fight between these martial experts of such dissimilar methods is intriguing.Who would emerge victorious or who was historically the better fighter is a question occasionally raised, but it is really a moot question.Janice Nimura spoke with author Marie Mutsuki Mockett.From time to time it is interesting to ponder the outcome of an encounter between two of history's most formidable and highly skilled warriors: the Medieval European knight and the feudal Japanese samurai.Will the samurai be wearing the older box-like Muromachi armor and armed with a tachi blade?Or will he wear the later close fitting Of course, for the sake of engaging discourse let us hypothesize just what would happen if these two comparable individuals, each highly trained and experienced in the respective fighting skills of their age, were to meet on the battlefield in single combat to the death (! As an amusing historical diversion we can at least make an educated guess to what would possibly be, not the result, so much as some of the key decisive elements of such an encounter.In one sense, it is like asking who are better soldiers, jungle fighters or ski troops? First of all, we must ask where is it these two lone warriors would meet? Since the conditions of this imaginary fight could play a major factor, it can be proposed that such an encounter would best take place on a flat, firm, open field with no cover and plenty of room to maneuver.Though each is an accomplished horseman, it would also be conducive to have the single-combat duel occur dismounted, alone, on foot and without use of missile weapons.Or will the encounter be a blind one in which neither knows anything about their adversary?We might want to just assume that each of our ideal combatants has been informed to some degree regarding the other and therefore mentally prepared and composed.