Now, if all countries were to take this approach, we would see London selected to be the sole representative of Britain, or Boston and its suburbs representing the U. This year, in fact, saw a separate score calculated for Massachusetts, which if taken as the nation’s results, would grab the top spot in reading with eight other nations, 2nd place in science with ten other nations, and 12th in math.Tags: Essay On DivorceTechnology Affects Us EssayAutomatic Essay GraderRainy Season Essay WritingBiology Essay Questions And AnswersWriting An Introduction To An Analytical EssayBusiness Management PlanningEssays On Race Relations In America
Only an independent audit of the results could prove conclusively whether the very best fruit was picked from the tree, but the sampling process does not preclude the potential for manipulation.
At face value, the PISA results appear to be a huge propaganda victory for the educational systems of Asians and the Chinese.
This year, Chinese administrators chose their students from a group of cities and regions aptly named B-S-J-G, after Beijing, a province-level municipality, Jiangsu, a province on the eastern coast of the country, Guangdong, a southern coastal province, and Shanghai, a province-level municipality.
Previously, Chinese authorities had chosen Shanghai as mainland China’s sole representative, whose students finished at the top of all three subject areas in both the previous two PISA studies in 20.
Rather, the very best schools were chosen and the very best students were cherry-picked from those schools.
Ong Kian Ming, a lawmaker in Malaysia recently raised this issue concerning Malaysia’s PISA results, claiming the education ministry attempted to rig the sample size in order to boost the scores.The results of the most recent Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) are out, and again reveal students from East Asian countries dominate in maths and sciences.The assessment, run by the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) every three years, tested around 540,000 15-year-old students in 72 countries and economies on science, reading, maths and collaborative problem-solving.Once the schools are chosen, each country or education system submits student listing forms.On test day, student participation must be at least 80%.Still others argue government investment in educational infrastructure, such as building more schools and attracting the best teachers, yields the greatest results.But before we accept the results at face value, we should delve more deeply into Pisa's problematic methodology, which are two-fold.In the case of the bizarre B-S-J-G grouping, PISA administrators have again made another exception for China—just as many foreign businesses have been forced to do—in the hope that the nation will eventually play by the rules.Perhaps the OECD's intention in allowing cities and groups of cities/regions to compete is to coax China and others into eventually releasing nationwide results.Now, if all countries were to take this approach, we would see London selected to be the sole representative of Britain, or Boston and its suburbs representing the U. This year, in fact, saw a separate score calculated for Massachusetts, which if taken as the nation’s results, would grab the top spot in reading with eight other nations, 2nd place in science with ten other nations, and 12th in math.If we dig deeper into the sampling, we come across another potential problem with the PISA testing: that the sampling done on mainland China (Beijing, Jiangsu, Guangdong and Shanghai) and other cities was not taken from a wide variety of schools.