Tags: Problem Solution Essay 4th GradeResearch Proposal Summary ExampleDescriptive Essay Graphic OrganizerPossible Ap Us History Essay Questions 2012Forensic Science Paper IdeasEssays Online To ReadReading And Critical Thinking Pearson
Many people are alarmed about the state of journalism.Polls have been indicating more and more that the audience is wondering how honest and fair journalists are.They cannot express personal feelings, likes or dislikes to color news stories.
They must avoid profanity and they cannot invade the privacy of others or glorify bad behavior. Everyone in the audience has an equal right to expect to be treated fairly, regardless of race, color, philosophy, religion, gender, age, or economic status.
They should never apply different standards to different people or groups.
Basic terms go undefined and more complex concepts continue to spawn debate and even ideological chaos.
For some, the message is the match that ignites the flames of progressive social discourse and, in many cases, of communal discord.
For one thing, the subjectivity of the persons involved in the story (the reporter and the one being reported on)is part of the “objective” reality of the story-and not reporter, even with the help of a psychiatrist, can ever come close to doing justice to that. In theory, at least in traditional idealistic press theory, news reports should be (1) information needed by an audience, (2) reporting that avoids harm to the society, and (3) factual, accurate, balanced, relevant and complete. I would agree with those who say that journalist is one who works for an institutionalized medium in capacity relating to the getting, writing, editing and commenting of the news.
But, nine-tenths of the news today is not needed by its audience…. Ok, that is related to the word “journalist”, but what about the word “professional”.It has evolved into infotainment, into personality profiles, and into soft and slushy stories, somewhere between news features and entertainment, between polemic and propaganda.Objective is one of the most misunderstood terms in journalism, Many (like most postmodernists of today) call it naïve empiricism; others refer to it as an unachievable ideal; others maintain that it should not be used at all. It is always incomplete, although its facts may be accurate. Many journalists consider them professionals and journalism as a profession. Being a “professional journalist” for example, to many, simply implies being a hard-working, efficient, quality journalist-doing well the task assumed.Jacques Derrida, a French philosopher who has been a leader in inter-subjective postmodernism, has argued that interpretation is part of reality.Increasingly, however, journalists are beginning to recognize the impossibility (and the weakness) of so-called objectivity.Accuracy is the highest of the principles of the ethical journalist, and it means that every bit of information printed has to be exact; spelling, facts, names, places, quotes, etc.Even the smallest mistake cuts into the journalist's credibility.And, of course, historically, news has been considered, despite semantic difficulties, the core substance of journalism.But, from a realistic perspective, news today has lost its primary status.Basic public communication concepts such as news, objectivity, truth, journalism, reporter, magazine, newspaper, social media, bias, propaganda, mass, public opinion, profession, media (all kind) and media ethics-these and many others wait meaningful definitions.One of the most troublesome of the concepts is “the news”. Journalists generally claims they know the news when they see it.