Tags: Ford Business PlanSystem Theory EssaysSailing To Byzantium EssayCharacter Analysis Essay Of The CrucibleEconomic Condition Of Pakistan EssayMies Van Der Rohe Working ThesisM.Phil Thesis In Political ScienceProblem Solving About FractionsToilet Paper HelperWriting A Good Discursive Essay
Though the other one is perfectly acceptable, an ideal research hypothesis should contain a prediction, which is why the more formal ones are favored.A scientist who becomes fixated on proving a research hypothesis loses their impartiality and credibility.
In fact, a hypothesis is never proved, and it is better practice to use the terms ‘supported’ or ‘verified’.
This means that the research showed that the evidence supported the hypothesis and further research is built upon that.
Perhaps environmental factors or pollution are causal effects influencing fish stocks.
A hypothesis must be testable, taking into account current knowledge and techniques, and be realistic.
Statistical tests often uncover trends, but rarely give a clear-cut answer, with other factors often affecting the outcome and influencing the results.
Whilst gut instinct and logic tells us that fish stocks are affected by over fishing, it is not necessarily true and the researcher must consider that outcome.
If the researcher does not have a multi-million dollar budget then there is no point in generating complicated hypotheses.
A hypothesis must be verifiable by statistical and analytical means, to allow a verification or falsification.
Scientists then use a large battery of deductive methods to arrive at a hypothesis that is testable, falsifiable and realistic.
The precursor to a hypothesis is a research problem, usually framed as a question. For example, we might wonder why the stocks of cod in the North Atlantic are declining.