One was drawn over the extent to which the values of elites should direct government economic policy.Another was drawn over the role of values in social science in general, but, particularly, in economics. His parents worked a hundred-acre farm outside of Otterville in Oxford County.Tags: Independent Record Label Business PlanFahrenheit 451 Essay QuestionsSpring In Kashmir EssayCinema Business PlanArt Of The Freshman EssayBusiness Plan For Small Business Pdf
From 1947 until 1952 he was Dean of Graduate Studies at Toronto, and had, in the meantime been a member of a Federal Royal Commission on Transportation.
These public appointments say much for his influence on the economics profession in Canada, but they are not the end of it.
His approach gave him grounds for assessing the economics profession itself. Indeed, it gained high fashion following Michel Foucault’s discussion of the biased information environments that he called “epistemes,” and following Jacques Derrida’s emphasis on the linguistic context of all knowledge, both of which were related to analyses of prevalent modes of thinking.
Harold Adams Innis was born on November 5, 1894, in Otterville, Ontario, the first born of William Anson and Mary (Adams) Innis.
He took a personal interest in the politics of the Department of Economics and Political Science at the University of Saskatchewan, which was headed by his student and close friend George Britnell.
Perhaps his greatest influence was exercised through Canada’s Social Science Research council of which he was Chairman in 1945-46, and Chairman of the Grants-in-Aid Committee for its first nine years.
For all his involvement in the institutionalization of economics in Canada, Innis did not withdraw from contacts in the United States.
He was involved in the founding of the Economic History Association and the launching of the . At the same time Innis continued his interest in the general debates over the nature of economics in the United States, reviving his interaction with Frank Knight and eventually leading to his presidency of the American Economics Association in 1951.
He was the Association’s second president, and was deeply involved with the Committee on Research in Economic History, sponsored by the Social Science Research Council of the United States. Innis has been the only president of the Economic History Association or the American Economic Association never to become an American citizen.
It was these activities that brought Innis into close contact with American economic historians, Arthur H. The lines of cleavage in the 1930s American debate over the nature of economics are now being clarified (Yonay, 1998; Morgan and Rutherford, 1998).